|
Did
the official investigation into UFOs prove or disprove their existence?
 |
| In
October of 1966, Dr. Edward Condon was selected
by U.S. Air Force to head a $500,000 study
about Unidentified Flying Ojebcts. In an effort
to maintain a neutral investigation it was
assigned to the University of Colorado.
|
|
| The
University gathered a team of 11 eminent scientists.
They were to analyze and make public their
conclusions of the most compelling UFO cases. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Case
2:
|
| Lakenheath,
England |
| August
13-14,
1956 |
| In
conclusion, although conventional or natural
explanations certainly cannot be ruled out,
the probability of such seems low in this
case and the probability that at least one
genuine UFO was involved appears to be fairly
high. |
|
|
|
|
Case
21:
|
| Colorado
Springs, Colorado |
|
May 13, 1967 |
| This
must remain as one of the most puzzling radar
cases on record, and no conclusion is possible
at this time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case
46:
|
| McMinnville,
Oregon |
| May
11, 1950 |
| This
is one of the few UFO reports in which all
factors investigated -- geometric, psychological,
and physical -- appear to be consistent with
the assertion that an extraordinary flying
object, silvery, metallic, disk-shaped, tens
of meters in diameter, and evidently artificial,
flew within sight of two witnesses. |
|
|
|
| While
the panel of scientist conducted an objective investigation,
the project leaders appeared biased and ignored
the data. Dr. Condon stated that nothing has come
from the study of UFOs that has added to scientific
knowledge. |
|
|
|
|
|
|

The
investigation was published as the Scientific Study of Unidentified
Flying Object.
Dr.
Condons conclusions are still being cited by the U.S. Air
Force as an excuse to prevent further official scientific investigation.
Out
of 63 cases investigated, 29% remain unexplained to this day.
|